Jump to content


Photo

Canada fine tuning immigration policy


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 1PPCLI

1PPCLI
  • Senior Member
  • 420 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, AB
  • Interests:PSK-31, 80M DX
  • Visa type:Naturalization, None
  • em

Posted 03 March 2012 - 12:45 AM

OTTAWA - A five-year sponsorship bar to crack down on bogus marriages of convenience falls short of addressing the real problem, critics said Friday, shortly after Immigration Minister Jason Kenney announced the regulatory change.

Starting immediately, Kenney said spouses will have to wait five years from the day they are granted permanent residence status before they can sponsor a new partner.

The move is meant to prevent people from fraudulently marrying Canadians for the purposes of immigration only to leave them and then sponsor a new partner while their Canadian spouse is still financially responsible for them for three years.

``I held town hall meetings across the country to hear from victims of marriage fraud,'' said Kenney, who made the announcement in Brampton, Ont., just west of Toronto.

``In addition to the heartbreak and pain that came from being lied to and deceived, these people were angry. They felt they had been used as a way to get to Canada. We're taking action because immigration to Canada should not be built upon deceit.''

NDP immigration critic Don Davies, however, said the new rule fails address those cases in which Canadian citizens are complicit in these bogus marriages.

Canada should be investing more resources into overseas immigration bureaus that vet applicants before they come to Canada in order to stop marriage fraud before it occurs, Davies said.

``Of all the problems in the immigration system - we have a backlog of a million, wait times are appalling, we have hundreds of thousands of families in this country who are unable to sponsor their parents because there's a freeze . . . and Minister Kenney thinks the most important thing to legislate on is the relatively small number of people who are engaged in marriages of convenience. I don't think that that's where the focus of immigration reform should be,'' he said.

``Where I would put my focus is on prevention rather than the defeatist position of the minister which is simply to ramp up penalties after the problem has occurred and after the pain has been caused.''

That said, Davies fears the government will actually cut resources for overseas missions by five to 10 per cent as part of austerity measures being taken by all departments in a bid to erase the federal deficit by 2015.

Canadians will find out more when the budget is tabled on March 29.

The regulatory change comes less than two years after the Conservatives promised to tackle marriage fraud. In the fall of 2010, the government held online consultations to gather public opinion and ideas on how to address the issue.

The idea of a five-year sponsorship bar was proposed in the Canada Gazette last April and was followed by a 30-day public comment period.

It also comes just weeks after outspoken Ottawa victim Lainie Towell's ex-husband was, after a three-year fight, finally deported to his native Guinea after walking out on her just three weeks after they exchanged vows.

Towell, a performance artist who made national headlines when she donned a wedding gown, strapped a red door to her back and marched on Parliament Hill to draw attention to the issue of marriage fraud, welcomed the announcement but also raised concerns about manpower shortages within the department.

The government, she suggested, can pass all the laws and regulations it wants, but if there aren't enough staff around to answer people's complaints and conduct investigations, they're not a lot of good.

The measure officially came into force on Friday and is just one of several actions the government is considering.

Public consultations will begin in the coming weeks on a proposed conditional permanent-residence provision that would deter people in newer relationships from attempting to gain quick entry to Canada when they have no plans to remain with their sponsoring partner.

According to the proposal first published in the Canada Gazette last spring, the sponsored partner in a marriage or common-law relationship of less than two years would be subject to a conditional two-year period of permanent residence.

The measure would bring Canada in line with other countries, such as the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia, which have similar policies.

It's not clear exactly how many cases of marriage fraud occur every year in Canada, but victims' groups and immigration lawyers have said it's in the thousands.

tcohen(at)postmedia.com

Twitter.com/tobicohen

Copyright © Postmedia News

http://www.canada.co...3009/story.html




#2 SeeSea

SeeSea
  • Senior Member
  • 400 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Pigeons, Paperclips, Pianos
  • em

Posted 04 March 2012 - 01:15 AM

So whomever is the victim of a scam is the one being punished for it? Or are they trying to crack down on daisy chain marriages of convenience by certain cultures who buy their wedding arrangements for big money.


#3 1PPCLI

1PPCLI
  • Senior Member
  • 420 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, AB
  • Interests:PSK-31, 80M DX
  • Visa type:Naturalization, None
  • em

Posted 04 March 2012 - 03:20 AM

Sounds like they are replicating the US system of a 2yr temporary green card, to weed out the spouses who arrive and run.

Last week the government made two changes to immigration policy, this and how LMOs will be handled. Guess they are moving in a piece meal fashion to effect some changes.

#4 MrkGrismer

MrkGrismer
  • Moderators
  • 12,855 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Auburn Hills, MI
  • Visa type:Naturalization, None
  • lo

Posted 05 March 2012 - 02:14 PM

Might be better than the U.S. system. In the U.S. when you sign an Affidavit of Support you are committed to financial support for 10 years. However, if the beneficiary permanently leaves the country the obligation ends. I am not sure how many 'fraud' cases the conditional green card actually catches. It doesn't seem like it is that hard to circumvent, but then when you read about actual fraud cases it is like they weren't even trying to avoid getting caught.

If you believe Modern Sporting Rifles have a legitimate use, please like, share and participate on: https://www.facebook...tamateSportsmen

http://www.uscis.gov...0004718190aRCRD
 

Medical Exams – A caller explained that the civil surgeon who completed the medical exam used the wrong form and then wanted to charge an indigent refugee to reprocess the paperwork on the correct form. What recourse does an applicant have if this occurs?

USCIS Response: Customers should notify the Director of their local office when they have a complaint about a civil surgeon.


#5 1PPCLI

1PPCLI
  • Senior Member
  • 420 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, AB
  • Interests:PSK-31, 80M DX
  • Visa type:Naturalization, None
  • em

Posted 05 March 2012 - 05:19 PM

Well, I have to say the current government is trying to address some of the issues in the current immigration policy. They are now requiring certain classes of immigrants to display competency in one of the two official languages, have professionals' credentials assessed before issuing the visa, so there are no surprises when they immigrate and find their profession not attainable for them.

Even today, the Opposition wants to introduce a private member's bill, so when a TRV is denied, the reason has to be clearly stated, and what route of appeal is. Apparently only 20% of applications are denied, but certain countries the rate are considerably higher.

Generally, I think all of these proposed changes are beneficial.

#6 MrkGrismer

MrkGrismer
  • Moderators
  • 12,855 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Auburn Hills, MI
  • Visa type:Naturalization, None
  • lo

Posted 08 March 2012 - 10:24 PM

http://canadianimmig...738z_o.facebook

If you believe Modern Sporting Rifles have a legitimate use, please like, share and participate on: https://www.facebook...tamateSportsmen

http://www.uscis.gov...0004718190aRCRD
 

Medical Exams – A caller explained that the civil surgeon who completed the medical exam used the wrong form and then wanted to charge an indigent refugee to reprocess the paperwork on the correct form. What recourse does an applicant have if this occurs?

USCIS Response: Customers should notify the Director of their local office when they have a complaint about a civil surgeon.


#7 SeeSea

SeeSea
  • Senior Member
  • 400 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Pigeons, Paperclips, Pianos
  • em

Posted 10 March 2012 - 03:43 AM

A clear reason for denials of TRV's would be helpful. Our denials didn't make any sense.
From what I have seen, US system vs CDN, it seems like in the US it's easier to get in, harder to stay. In Canada it seems harder to get in, but one you're in, you're in.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users